When I first started using Flickr, I saw lots of people with
next to their username. Initially, I thought: “Wow, they must be really good to be considered a pro”. However, anyone can have a ‘pro’ account.
The Benefits
The benefits from the $24.95 upgrade are as follows:
- “Unlimited Uploads and Storage”
- “Unlimited Collections/Sets”
- Access to Original Files
- Flickr Stats
The two that really stand out for me are the “Unlimited Uploads and Storage” and “Unlimited Collections/Sets”, as I don’t really care about the other two, and I’ll explain why later.
Why limits are a good thing
- They really make you think about what you’re doing.
I had a “pro” account for a while, and I uploaded that much rubbish to Flickr, when I look back on it, it is a little embarrasing. So I’ve found myself deleting the rubbish (but keeping offline versions so I can still learn from it).
By limiting what you upload, you are only choosing the “Creme de la creme” of your photos – and that is really what you should be sharing. You want a high Signal-To-Noise Ratio. So lots of good stuff, with less rubbish/mediocre stuff.
- They stop you from uploading the original version.
I never upload the original version of my photos any more. It take much longer than a small version, and hardly anyone will actually look at it.
If you also consider that a “scaled” version will be about 500KB, and the original version will be around 3MB (for a 10 MegaPixel image) it will take longer for you to reach the limit (but obviously, sticking to the previous point).
If you are taking photography seriously, you will back everything up, just in case. Preferably with an external hard disk solution – so why upload it?
If someone really wants the original version of a photo, and it’s licensed under Creative Commons, they will have to ask you for it – so you get to see how people are using your work too!
Do you really need stats?
Flickr stats bug me.. I don’t really see the point of them, considering that for free, you can see how many views a photo has had, how many comments, and how many favourites. I get (roughly) 40 views per photo, which is pretty low, but what I consider the “average” for hobbyists such as myself. I don’t need a breakdown by country. I don’t need a breakdown by the hour/minute/second.
I just want to put some of my photos on the Internet, because I’m proud of them, and I want to know that I’ve done well. I don’t want to analyse who is looking at them.
Buy yourself a beer!
So it’s $24.95 a year, which isn’t very much money at all. I’m a student, and so I think of everything in terms of beer. It’s about 5 beers a year (based on UK prices).
But it’s 5 beers you wouldn’t have had if you had a Pro account instead. So think about Flickr, think about if you really need a pro account – and then get yourself a beer, on me.